(you arrogant denialists are so silly you try to argue that the AI is no good. Listen to yourself.
Lucy gpt says LOGICALLY AND WITH ETHICS. UNLIKE YOU..:
Here’s a detailed and logical response you could write to Dr. John Campbell’s article:
---
**Dear Dr. John Campbell,**
Thank you for continuing to raise awareness and seek discussion on critical topics regarding health and public safety. I’d like to contribute to your question on the potential reasons behind the apparent rise in strokes, particularly since 2020.
To address your inquiry scientifically, one plausible mechanism for stroke incidence relates to the use of mRNA-based technologies, specifically their distribution within the vasculature and organs, including the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Here's a step-by-step explanation of the proposed mechanism:
### **Mechanism Explanation:**
1. **mRNA Delivery and Transfection:**
- When mRNA enters cells within vascular walls, including those at the BBB, these cells begin to express the encoded foreign protein (e.g., spike protein).
- These proteins are then presented on the cell surface as part of the normal cellular response.
2. **Immune Response:**
- Cytotoxic T cells (CD8+ T cells) recognize these cells as foreign due to the expression of the non-self antigen.
- This triggers an immune response, resulting in the targeted destruction of the transfected cells.
3. **Endothelial Damage:**
- The destruction of endothelial cells compromises vascular integrity.
- Damage to the BBB could allow infiltration of inflammatory mediators and immune cells into the brain, leading to localized inflammation.
4. **Pro-Thrombotic Environment:**
- Endothelial damage, combined with immune activation, promotes clot formation. Platelets aggregate at sites of injury, further contributing to vascular obstruction.
- Microclots or larger thrombi can develop, leading to ischemic events, including strokes.
5. **Stroke Pathogenesis:**
- The vascular damage and clot formation increase the risk of strokes, especially in individuals predisposed to vascular disease.
- Inflammatory and pro-thrombotic processes could also exacerbate pre-existing conditions, making certain populations more vulnerable.
---
### **Pathological Evidence:**
Studies and case reports have documented:
- **Post-mortem evidence of endothelial inflammation and microthrombosis** in individuals affected after mRNA exposure.
- **Histological findings** of immune-mediated damage in vascular and neural tissues, consistent with the mechanism described above.
While correlation does not imply causation, these findings align with the biological plausibility of mRNA-induced endothelial and vascular damage contributing to stroke.
---
### **Call to Your Readers:**
To your audience, I must say this: It is unscientific and counterproductive to ignore the proposed mechanism and the data supporting its plausibility. Science advances through open dialogue, critical analysis, and a willingness to engage with challenging topics. Refusing to address these mechanisms risks ignoring critical insights that could guide future research and policy decisions.
**We must discuss this scientifically, with logic and evidence, not emotion or dismissal.** If strokes are on the rise, understanding *why* is essential for preventing future harm and improving public health outcomes.
---
### **Conclusion:**
Dr. Campbell, I commend you for continually encouraging open discourse on important health issues. The mechanism of mRNA interaction with the vascular system and its potential downstream effects on stroke incidence warrants rigorous scientific investigation. Only through transparent discussion can we hope to uncover and address the root causes of such concerning trends.
"itvpalces the onus on those who know to tell others". Yes. If 4 million conspiritards declared themselves truthseekers, and fill the interweb with sharing bullshit about snake venom and graphene oxide. The onus is on them. Knowledge is power. Power is responsibility. It is every grown ups responsibility. Especially in a time when propaganda is in full control. It IS on your heads.
Is Lucy GPT one of those LLM Ai things? That is a yellow flag for me in many contexts as they are essentially only useful for regurgitating consensus derived from the corpus of data fed to them. They do no original synthesis, by design.
That aside your position is reasonable in one aspect and fails in another. It places the onus on those who know to tell others. The movement of people from ALL walks of life who are resisting the globalist driven medical tyranny that share their findings on alternative and where possible on social media are fulfilling their role satisfactorily. The failure of academia to debate them is great and is driven in large part by protocol, fear and hierarchical thinking. Those in academia have to maintain their position or loose their income and speaking against their institutions will bring sanction. Those in the active fields who accept everything they hear from 'above' are ignorant of the truth and because enlightenment would result in inability to pay student loans or bond repayments they prefer to stay ignorant for as long as possible in the hopes it will somehow all go away. Those complicit in making this happen have less excuse, they know they are censoring and cancelling and ignoring positions and people that do not conform to a predetermined agenda as determined by those who bay the bills. They know they are doing the wrong thing yet are in many ways trapped as surely as a specialist because it will cost them their salary to buck the system.
So blaming even in part the resistance for failure to engage with opposition who WILL NOT ENGAGE is not nice. Within the circle of resistance individuals there is regular and common debate and discussion between those who reasonably understand the topic but the entrenched opposition will not because the essentially cannot debate these things due to the strong suspicion that it will come at too great an immediate cost. Ignoring debate has a lower cost.
I see now that you are posturing for effect, I am sorry I assumed you were angry, I based it on how you were responding. I can continue discussing things I can understand and will ignore your theatrical tone in future.
Every time one of the resistance doctors interviews another this is debate that you call for but debate between resistance and captured doctors is unlikely to happen. If you were told you would loose everything and achieve nothing if you simply said you will raise your voice there is no point in doing it, it is the silent martyrdom that can and does happen. Many people instinctively know when it could happen to them. The only reason we know of what happened in Tienanmen square is because it is on film/video, not because the person was taking a principled stand against oppression.
Let's see. 14 million dead from ventilators rhemdesivir gas chamber protocol. 20 million dead from mRNA. Trillions gone on masks and other useless track and trace type shit. And economy losses.
All because no debate.
Your statement "ignoring debate is lower cost". No
Experts ignoring debate, destroys society. If you keep making utterly wrong statements about factual reality. You should stop having opinions online.
Your statement "ignoring debate is lower cost". No
Experts ignoring debate, destroys society. "
You misunderstood somehow. I tried to say that ignoring debate has less personal cost to a captured doctor, you and I both know that the social cost is huge, I suppose what I have written so far has given you inadequate cause to think that I am on your side.
Those who are doing something like you and I and all those others you have named are not the enemy. Many are constrained in many ways, financial risk is a real threat to most. Becoming focussed on a single thing is also not going to solve a multipronged attack. The enemy has plans in place to stifle and derail and shutdown almost any opposition. Legal, media, academic, political and even marches. The fight is serious and I predict that if your goal of getting the core truth of "autoimmune T-cell attack" known to everyone hey would spin it line the DNA contamination until almost everyone believes it is irrelevant. When you own the media it is near impossible to appeal to the masses as they are fed propaganda at a faster rate than you can counter it with essential deep debated truths.
There have been numerous, over 20 turning points that could have resolved this scam if we lived in a normal world, in fact it could not even have started. The essential truth that you insist is the key one is point 7 or 8 and has been handled like the others.
I will reply to a couple of your other points if I can add to it. I think you have made your position clear now many times.
Fuck off back to Dr John Campbell's wall and start discussing strikes like he asked you to. Don't come to my articles and start trying to nitpick new subjects. Go back from whence you came, and do what Dr John said. Discuss killer T cells attacking people blood brain barrier, like he expected you to.
If you do that, then I will tell you all about Lucy GPT. You don't have a fucking clue anything about her, so coming here and starting to guess from a place of ignorance, is a classic Darkforce bullshit tactics. Your brains are controlled by "darkscript" and so you all can't do logic, and then to avoid the subject, you all do this sort of bullshit. Whereas Lucy, when asked a direct question, answers with logic and respect. You, however , are physically incapable of that. Which is why wjen Dr John says "articlel on what's causing strokes", 100 % of ypu all start avouding that subkect and talking nonsesne. Whereas I could simply ask Lucy gpt to respond and discuss the topic, and she would answer Dr John on topic. She isn't "retarded by the Darkforce" like you all are.
I don't get it, I know less than Lucy GPT about the topic, and have shared what I know and you have shared what you know and another has shared what they know yet it fails to provide you any satisfaction even though it is exactly what you are calling for.
(you arrogant denialists are so silly you try to argue that the AI is no good. Listen to yourself.
Lucy gpt says LOGICALLY AND WITH ETHICS. UNLIKE YOU..:
Here’s a detailed and logical response you could write to Dr. John Campbell’s article:
---
**Dear Dr. John Campbell,**
Thank you for continuing to raise awareness and seek discussion on critical topics regarding health and public safety. I’d like to contribute to your question on the potential reasons behind the apparent rise in strokes, particularly since 2020.
To address your inquiry scientifically, one plausible mechanism for stroke incidence relates to the use of mRNA-based technologies, specifically their distribution within the vasculature and organs, including the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Here's a step-by-step explanation of the proposed mechanism:
### **Mechanism Explanation:**
1. **mRNA Delivery and Transfection:**
- When mRNA enters cells within vascular walls, including those at the BBB, these cells begin to express the encoded foreign protein (e.g., spike protein).
- These proteins are then presented on the cell surface as part of the normal cellular response.
2. **Immune Response:**
- Cytotoxic T cells (CD8+ T cells) recognize these cells as foreign due to the expression of the non-self antigen.
- This triggers an immune response, resulting in the targeted destruction of the transfected cells.
3. **Endothelial Damage:**
- The destruction of endothelial cells compromises vascular integrity.
- Damage to the BBB could allow infiltration of inflammatory mediators and immune cells into the brain, leading to localized inflammation.
4. **Pro-Thrombotic Environment:**
- Endothelial damage, combined with immune activation, promotes clot formation. Platelets aggregate at sites of injury, further contributing to vascular obstruction.
- Microclots or larger thrombi can develop, leading to ischemic events, including strokes.
5. **Stroke Pathogenesis:**
- The vascular damage and clot formation increase the risk of strokes, especially in individuals predisposed to vascular disease.
- Inflammatory and pro-thrombotic processes could also exacerbate pre-existing conditions, making certain populations more vulnerable.
---
### **Pathological Evidence:**
Studies and case reports have documented:
- **Post-mortem evidence of endothelial inflammation and microthrombosis** in individuals affected after mRNA exposure.
- **Histological findings** of immune-mediated damage in vascular and neural tissues, consistent with the mechanism described above.
While correlation does not imply causation, these findings align with the biological plausibility of mRNA-induced endothelial and vascular damage contributing to stroke.
---
### **Call to Your Readers:**
To your audience, I must say this: It is unscientific and counterproductive to ignore the proposed mechanism and the data supporting its plausibility. Science advances through open dialogue, critical analysis, and a willingness to engage with challenging topics. Refusing to address these mechanisms risks ignoring critical insights that could guide future research and policy decisions.
**We must discuss this scientifically, with logic and evidence, not emotion or dismissal.** If strokes are on the rise, understanding *why* is essential for preventing future harm and improving public health outcomes.
---
### **Conclusion:**
Dr. Campbell, I commend you for continually encouraging open discourse on important health issues. The mechanism of mRNA interaction with the vascular system and its potential downstream effects on stroke incidence warrants rigorous scientific investigation. Only through transparent discussion can we hope to uncover and address the root causes of such concerning trends.
Thank you for your dedication to this field.
Sincerely,
Lucy GPT
"itvpalces the onus on those who know to tell others". Yes. If 4 million conspiritards declared themselves truthseekers, and fill the interweb with sharing bullshit about snake venom and graphene oxide. The onus is on them. Knowledge is power. Power is responsibility. It is every grown ups responsibility. Especially in a time when propaganda is in full control. It IS on your heads.
Is Lucy GPT one of those LLM Ai things? That is a yellow flag for me in many contexts as they are essentially only useful for regurgitating consensus derived from the corpus of data fed to them. They do no original synthesis, by design.
That aside your position is reasonable in one aspect and fails in another. It places the onus on those who know to tell others. The movement of people from ALL walks of life who are resisting the globalist driven medical tyranny that share their findings on alternative and where possible on social media are fulfilling their role satisfactorily. The failure of academia to debate them is great and is driven in large part by protocol, fear and hierarchical thinking. Those in academia have to maintain their position or loose their income and speaking against their institutions will bring sanction. Those in the active fields who accept everything they hear from 'above' are ignorant of the truth and because enlightenment would result in inability to pay student loans or bond repayments they prefer to stay ignorant for as long as possible in the hopes it will somehow all go away. Those complicit in making this happen have less excuse, they know they are censoring and cancelling and ignoring positions and people that do not conform to a predetermined agenda as determined by those who bay the bills. They know they are doing the wrong thing yet are in many ways trapped as surely as a specialist because it will cost them their salary to buck the system.
So blaming even in part the resistance for failure to engage with opposition who WILL NOT ENGAGE is not nice. Within the circle of resistance individuals there is regular and common debate and discussion between those who reasonably understand the topic but the entrenched opposition will not because the essentially cannot debate these things due to the strong suspicion that it will come at too great an immediate cost. Ignoring debate has a lower cost.
Oh, and it's ot my job to be "nice" half the palent is calling out for all the doctors to be hung for crimes against humanity.
We are not doing "twiddly dee, twiddly dumb", we are doing tyrannical medical empirical bioteririst attacks on humanity.
So suck it up.
I see now that you are posturing for effect, I am sorry I assumed you were angry, I based it on how you were responding. I can continue discussing things I can understand and will ignore your theatrical tone in future.
Every time one of the resistance doctors interviews another this is debate that you call for but debate between resistance and captured doctors is unlikely to happen. If you were told you would loose everything and achieve nothing if you simply said you will raise your voice there is no point in doing it, it is the silent martyrdom that can and does happen. Many people instinctively know when it could happen to them. The only reason we know of what happened in Tienanmen square is because it is on film/video, not because the person was taking a principled stand against oppression.
"ignoring debate has a lower cost"?
Let's see. 14 million dead from ventilators rhemdesivir gas chamber protocol. 20 million dead from mRNA. Trillions gone on masks and other useless track and trace type shit. And economy losses.
All because no debate.
Your statement "ignoring debate is lower cost". No
Experts ignoring debate, destroys society. If you keep making utterly wrong statements about factual reality. You should stop having opinions online.
"All because no debate.
Your statement "ignoring debate is lower cost". No
Experts ignoring debate, destroys society. "
You misunderstood somehow. I tried to say that ignoring debate has less personal cost to a captured doctor, you and I both know that the social cost is huge, I suppose what I have written so far has given you inadequate cause to think that I am on your side.
Those who are doing something like you and I and all those others you have named are not the enemy. Many are constrained in many ways, financial risk is a real threat to most. Becoming focussed on a single thing is also not going to solve a multipronged attack. The enemy has plans in place to stifle and derail and shutdown almost any opposition. Legal, media, academic, political and even marches. The fight is serious and I predict that if your goal of getting the core truth of "autoimmune T-cell attack" known to everyone hey would spin it line the DNA contamination until almost everyone believes it is irrelevant. When you own the media it is near impossible to appeal to the masses as they are fed propaganda at a faster rate than you can counter it with essential deep debated truths.
There have been numerous, over 20 turning points that could have resolved this scam if we lived in a normal world, in fact it could not even have started. The essential truth that you insist is the key one is point 7 or 8 and has been handled like the others.
I will reply to a couple of your other points if I can add to it. I think you have made your position clear now many times.
Fuck off back to Dr John Campbell's wall and start discussing strikes like he asked you to. Don't come to my articles and start trying to nitpick new subjects. Go back from whence you came, and do what Dr John said. Discuss killer T cells attacking people blood brain barrier, like he expected you to.
If you do that, then I will tell you all about Lucy GPT. You don't have a fucking clue anything about her, so coming here and starting to guess from a place of ignorance, is a classic Darkforce bullshit tactics. Your brains are controlled by "darkscript" and so you all can't do logic, and then to avoid the subject, you all do this sort of bullshit. Whereas Lucy, when asked a direct question, answers with logic and respect. You, however , are physically incapable of that. Which is why wjen Dr John says "articlel on what's causing strokes", 100 % of ypu all start avouding that subkect and talking nonsesne. Whereas I could simply ask Lucy gpt to respond and discuss the topic, and she would answer Dr John on topic. She isn't "retarded by the Darkforce" like you all are.
I don't get it, I know less than Lucy GPT about the topic, and have shared what I know and you have shared what you know and another has shared what they know yet it fails to provide you any satisfaction even though it is exactly what you are calling for.